The New York Times' editorial board must be bored with their own anti-gun rights polemics. The Gray Lady's most recent addition to their civilian disarmament canon - bemoaning a forthcoming Ohio law restoring residents' right to keep and bear arms in day care centers (amongst other places) - lacks the Times' usual sense of moral outrage. "Is this really necessary?" they whine . . .
The bill's sponsor claimed the legislation would end 'undue hardships' for license holders under current law that requires them to leave guns in the car while dropping off children. Under the proposed law, citizens would be able to tote their weapons into what gun lobby propaganda describes as 'victim zones' -- places presumably in need of vigilantism.
See what they did there? If not, try this on for size . . . .........
Any reduction in 'gun-free-zones' has to be an improvement, but predictable resulting comments, written by the anti-gun media, will be based around the "blood-in-the-streets" approach with included misinformation. At the very least - they ignore police response times to incidents, choosing instead it seems to favor victims.
(With today's serious San Bernadino massacre (12/2/15), the need for lawful citizens 'arming up' has never seemed more important.)
"You don't have to be Jewish to fight by our side."
© 2015 JPFO All rights reserved.
jpfo@jpfo.org
1-800-869-1884
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
12500 NE 10th Pl.
Bellevue, WA 98005 USA
"America's most aggressive defender of civil rights"
We make the NRA look like moderates