5 Reasons the Second
Amendment Should Not Be Political
By Susanne Edward. July 10, 2025
Article Source
The right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. It is not a tool of one political party but rather is a right for all Americans, regardless of their background, income or voting history.
Here are five reasons why the Second Amendment shouldn't be a political battleground—and instead, a shared principle rooted in equality, protection and empowerment.
1. The Second Amendment Is a Great Equalizer
At its core, the Second Amendment is about self-preservation and the ability of individuals to defend themselves, especially when institutions fail to do so.
According to FBI data, over 1 million violent crimes were reported in 2021, including more than 600,000 aggravated assaults. Police response times vary widely—averaging 10 to 15 minutes in many areas and significantly longer in rural counties.
In 2020, nearly 40% of all first-time gun buyers were women, and purchases by black Americans rose by 58%, according to data from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). These trends continued into 2023, driven by concerns about personal safety and civil unrest.
Empowerment is not partisan. The ability to protect oneself is a fundamental right.
2. The Second Amendment Protects Everyone—Equally
The Constitution doesn't make exceptions: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Historically, gun control has been used to disarm and suppress certain groups of people. After the Civil War, "Black Codes" in Southern states explicitly restricted black Americans from owning firearms. In 1967, the Mulford Act was passed in California primarily in response to the Black Panther Party's armed patrols.
Today, the National African American Gun Association (NAAGA) has grown to over 45,000 members and the gun-rights group Pink Pistols advocates for armed self-defense amid rising hate crimes.
The Second Amendment is a civil-rights issue. It transcends party lines.
3. Democrats Own Guns, Too
Despite political stereotypes, millions of Democrats own firearms.
According to a 2023 Pew Research survey, 32% of Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents either personally own a gun or live in a household with one. Among independents, gun ownership is nearly identical to that of Republicans.
How many of these voters appreciate that the Second Amendment is an individual right and don't blame lawful gun owners for the actions of criminals, as Democratic Party leadership so often does, is unclear, but it is likely a big enough slice of the party to make them lose elections when their freedom is directly threatened.
4. "Gun-Free Zones" Often Attract, Not Deter, Violence
We are told that so-called "gun-free zones" are intended to promote safety and security, but, in practice, they often do the opposite.
A 2023 report by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) found that 94% of mass public shootings between 1950 and 2019 occurred in areas where civilians were banned from carrying firearms. These areas are soft targets for attackers who know law-abiding citizens are defenseless.
Real safety comes from preparedness and deterrence—not signs and bans on this fundamental right.
5. Recreational Shooting Is Empowering, Popular and Nonpartisan
Gun ownership isn't just about protection; it's also a recreational and cultural tradition for millions of Americans.
Shooting sports participation has surged. According to the NSSF, more than 5.4 million Americans purchased firearms for the first time in 2021, building on the historic surge of 2020. Many ranges and clubs report an increase in attendance from women, youth and minority communities.
Shooting fosters responsibility, confidence and focus. From hunting to competitive target shooting, it unites generations and communities—regardless of political identity.
It's not "gun culture." It's American culture.
The Second Amendment should not be a red-versus-blue issue. It is a constitutional guarantee intended to empower and protect all Americans.
Politicizing the right to bear arms undermines its purpose and weakens our ability to have constructive conversations. Just as we don't treat freedom of speech or the right to vote as privileges, we shouldn't do it with self-defense.
This right belongs to everyone—from urban liberals to rural conservatives, from legal immigrants to those who identify as LGBTQ. If more voters let even anti-gun politicians know this, then this issue will become much less political. That would help all of us preserve this basic human right.
