JPFO Applauds Texas Constitutional Carry

CNN, MSNBC, the networks and the newspapers are in an uproar asking pointless questions about guns and rights they publicly admit they have no knowledge about: "How can a state allow anyone to carry a gun without a license?" You mean you don't know? How can you be a reporter and ask such a question? Didn't you even try to find out? "No one in the state supports such an insane policy," they blather! If that were true, the policy would never have seen the light of day. Obviously someone must support it—like the legislature, their constituents, and the Governor. Constitutional Carry has broad national support for all the right reasons, wild-eyed media-fueled fears never materialize. The so-called "news" media is broadcasting their wholesale ignorance of the subject, instead of learning about the issue and broadcasting facts. Guns save lives.

Constitutional Carry is a great idea, it expands freedom. Arizona launched the term in 2010.
The very idea that fundamental rights cannot be exercised without a government license is so anti-American, reporters taking that position should be fired without delay or reeducated. Who are these people? Would they mandate testing to vote, or own Bibles, or any books? An educated public is a great idea, but a person without an education must not be denied any rights or privileges. It's just an incentive to make education widely available, again, for all the right reasons. JPFO supports marksmanship as a prerequisite for a high school diploma. On what basis would you argue against that? Contact JPFO to intelligently discuss the issue.

#####